12-11-2012, 10:32 PM
Nathaniel
Your left-right analysis is dizzying.
Chomsky faults John F. Kennedy for a hawk on Cuba and Vietnam, yet holds Pol Pot harmless for a Jim Jones-meets-Mao mass murder.
Love-and-marriage, horse-and-carriage:
Chomsky is perfectly willing to turn the world on its head with a bayonet to its throat in his murder of the truth.
All men (right, left, ambidextrous, adextrous) ought to love truth and freedom and peace, and abhor lies and oppression and war.
Chomsky doesn't serve the left or the right; he serves a grinning reaper of insatiable, unspeakable appetite.
Your left-right analysis is dizzying.
Chomsky faults John F. Kennedy for a hawk on Cuba and Vietnam, yet holds Pol Pot harmless for a Jim Jones-meets-Mao mass murder.
Love-and-marriage, horse-and-carriage:
Chomsky is perfectly willing to turn the world on its head with a bayonet to its throat in his murder of the truth.
All men (right, left, ambidextrous, adextrous) ought to love truth and freedom and peace, and abhor lies and oppression and war.
Chomsky doesn't serve the left or the right; he serves a grinning reaper of insatiable, unspeakable appetite.