Bloody Treason: The Assassination of John F. Kennedy

[David Josephs]

Piper was discredited at the EF years ago.

I suppose in the same way David Josephs discredited it here. Hmm...

David Josephs did a far better job of discrediting it than either you or Mark (or Paper) did of proving any Israel sponsorship.

I don't think you're following what I wrote Magda. I clearly stated I did not believe in sponsorship but that the remaining evidence was very solid proof of main facilitation. I don't know how people who totally avoided the discussion of the evidence have a right to later come in and condemn it.

David, on the other hand, had his facts completely wrong to the point where they blew up on him and he was forced to leave the thread. Those facts showed JFK had drastically cut the Israel budget in a move similar to his American University inclinations a month prior to the new backers being declared in Dallas.

Sir(s),

You've been asked repeatedly to simply provide the text within Piper's book that most convinces you of his conclusions...

You've offered nothing. Repeatedly.

The number of times Piper calims, "the evidence stands on its own" is comical to the point of absurd.

I've been here the entire time Albert(s)... and have gone back thru Piper's book to find such statements.
They don't exist.

He builds a case on the imaginary conflicts he creates between JFK and BG.
He SUPPOSES connections that don't exist and disregards programs like Gladio in its entirety.

I am not looking to reopen that discussion... if you want to start a new thread with a QUOTE FROM PIPER that supports his conclusion... please do so.
I've done more than my share of posting suppot to my argument...

as they used to say... WHERE'S THE BEEF?

DJ