19-01-2013, 10:21 PM
The point here: How could dissemination of this fact, among so many other official acknowledgments of the truth, bring us closer to ...
WHAT, exactly?
What do we want? I've been posing this question, in print and from podiums, to my brothers and sisters in the JFK assassination research community for nearly 20 years.
I've yet to discern a consensus answer.
What will satisfy us?
How is "justice" defined in this case?
When will these factoids come together, reach critical mass, and bring about change?
Change for the better?
Because truth be told, nearly 50 years after the first questions regarding the LN conclusion were raised, the revelation that the "CIA director told RFK there were two shooters" begs a response worthy of Miles Davis:
"So what?"
WHAT, exactly?
What do we want? I've been posing this question, in print and from podiums, to my brothers and sisters in the JFK assassination research community for nearly 20 years.
I've yet to discern a consensus answer.
What will satisfy us?
How is "justice" defined in this case?
When will these factoids come together, reach critical mass, and bring about change?
Change for the better?
Because truth be told, nearly 50 years after the first questions regarding the LN conclusion were raised, the revelation that the "CIA director told RFK there were two shooters" begs a response worthy of Miles Davis:
"So what?"