A Simple Question as We Prepare for the 50th

[Charles Drago]

Thanks, one and all, for your responses.

I respect you and your passions.

But you beg additional questions.

Upon whose authority will truth be accepted? The parent state? Caroline Kennedy? A box of previously undisclosed evidence?

None of those "authorities" can deliver Truth.

Thanks to the efforts of the brave researchers frequently praised on DPF, Truth about the public execution of JFK is largely knowable.

That Truth will never become "History" because its clarity is muddied and blurred by many: both those who have a vital interest in suppressing the Truth (eg for want of a better shorthand phrase, the military-multinational-intelligence complex), and those who are too foolish and obsessed to see it (eg "researchers" such as Fetzer and snake oil salesmen such as "Cinque").

Agreed. I would add that somehow -- against the immeasurable forces brought to bear by cultural and even biological imperatives -- we must no longer empower and default to the parent state for guidance, assurance, and truth. In the JFK case, the truths of conspiracy and cover-up and the identities of key Facilitators have been discovered and shared for decades. And we continue to learn more with each passing year.

But what good is truth if it is not used to bring about justice?

How do you define "justice" in this case?

And to what would "solving" this case bring closure?

I do not understand the meaning of "Closure". It is not a philosophical concept I can embrace.

The murder of JFK is but one atrocity in the larger conflict.

As for "justice", I recognise it at the level of personal morality.

I have never seen it at the level of state or court or corporation or church.

I define "justice" in this case as the enlightenment, empowerment, and liberation of the extended victims of the assassination -- the peoples of the world who continue to suffer the political, economic, and cultural oppression visited upon them by the Sponsors and their Facilitators.

I agree with Jan that "justice" begins at home, so to speak.

"Closure" is a subjective state of being. For me, I will experience "closure" in the case of JFK's assassination when the "justice" of which I write is experienced universally.

It is a virtual certainty that I shall not enjoy such an experience in this body. But enjoy it I shall. Because it is my faith that our personal and collective struggles continue beyond the demise of mortal self, and that the arc of the universe bends toward the "justice" sought by myself and countless others.

To hasten that day, I shall continue to engage the enemy by speaking truth to the power it wields and knowing the power that is peace.