A Simple Question as We Prepare for the 50th

[Phil Dragoo]

Said Groden, "In all likelihood, the fatal shot did not come from the Book Depository, but rather from the grassy knoll; whether or not Lee Oswald was firing, someone else had actually killed the President." He went on to describe how when the fourth shot was matched up to the pictures of the President's head "exploding," none of the other shots were in alignment with the [Zapruder] film. But when the THIRD shot was advanced to match up with those pictures "EVERY OTHER IMPULSE MATCHED AN ACTION ON THE FILM EXACTLY." In HIGH TREASON, Groden recounted how Professor Blakey took him aside and ordered him not to express to the Committee any conclusions that he had drawn from his study of the film and tapes. The Congressmen (and the world) were to be told that the fatal shot came from the rear, and the fourth shot was the only one to be considered the head shot. (Smith 147, original emphasis)

http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/the_critics...dence.html

And they were limited to FOUR when they might have had 6 or 7 or MORE

And of course that little me culpa in re the inconvenient Joannides whose files remain verboten--though this was a LONE GUNMAN

The end game? For the motorcade route to run red with the river of blood from John F. Kennedy to the last Cambodian


When Jesse Curry retired as police chief of Dallas, Texas, he wrote a book called "JFK Assassination File." In a 1969 interview for the Dallas Morning News around the time of publication, Curry stated,



"We don't have any proof that Oswald fired the rifle, and never did.
Nobody's yet been able to put him in that building with a gun in his hand."

http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.ph..._Testimony