29-01-2013, 10:29 PM
Gordon Gray Wrote:I don't know who they are to this day, Nobody does. I have stromg suspicians. But it has taken years to develop them. I was 17 when JFK died and hadn't even begun to question Vietnam. But I must have missed when Dulles, Helms, Phillips, Morales, etc, were tried and went to jail. And who knew at that time Harriman, Prescott and George Bush, along with a number Big Banking/Military Industialists, and several members of the Joint Chiefs, could be involved. IMO they have done a pretty good job of maintaining their plausible deniability. A lot of people who were involved and have known a lot about the conspiracy besides Oswald, maybe they even knew more than he did, have tried to speak out. What has happened to them? I think they could have managed an Oswald trial. They managed Ruby's and he knew a lot too. The reason we got the lone nut instead of Oswald/Castro IMO, is because Hoover was afraid for his reputation and the embarrassment of the Bureau, and Johnson was afraid of WWIII. But I agree with you that at the highest levels it mattered little whether they went into Cuba or Vietnam. They were in a position to take advantage of both.
Yeah, but you must admit the gross desperation to eliminate Oswald shows signs that this was the plan. Why was Tippit eliminated? In order to frame Oswald as a madman who was then gunned-down in the Texas Theater? Surely they hadn't planned on Ruby doing it since his behavior shows he was brought in on an ad lib plan. You're forgetting the captured Oswald could have told his role as far as the uninformed patsy. It is possible this Oswald could have told of being in the lunchroom and getting change for the Coke machine. This would have spoiled the plans of the unknown sponsors.
Gordon, the fact you are talking about them says they haven't done such a good job. They may be arrogant enough to think they can ignore it and get away with it but their actions speak louder than words.