01-02-2013, 12:00 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-02-2013, 12:21 PM by Jim DiEugenio.)
Nice piece of piffle Albert. And, as usual, you left out the reason why I wrote what I did. (Yawn)
Bravo Bernice.
That is the whole point. We are supposed to be the people who actually do research and unearth facts. And not just regurgitate what is in other people's books. (Some of which should have never been published.)
But somehow, the myths about people like Pitzer outlive the facts.
I think Alan has done some good work here. I mean, has anyone done as much work on that case as he? In addition to the photos, the research that he was not left handed, he has raised some questions about Dennis David.
As for me personally, Nigel Turner was one of the worst things to ever happen to the JFK community. Here is a man who had more opportunities to do good work and reach a large audience than any of us put together will ever have.
And after the initial series, what did he give us?
Bravo Bernice.
That is the whole point. We are supposed to be the people who actually do research and unearth facts. And not just regurgitate what is in other people's books. (Some of which should have never been published.)
But somehow, the myths about people like Pitzer outlive the facts.
I think Alan has done some good work here. I mean, has anyone done as much work on that case as he? In addition to the photos, the research that he was not left handed, he has raised some questions about Dennis David.
As for me personally, Nigel Turner was one of the worst things to ever happen to the JFK community. Here is a man who had more opportunities to do good work and reach a large audience than any of us put together will ever have.
And after the initial series, what did he give us?