04-02-2013, 06:10 PM
Quoting Mr. Charle Drago:
"But speaking only for myself, I cannot in good conscience allow the "Doyle" perfidy to go unaddressed. To "ignore" "Doyle," as at least one of my dear friends and DPF co-owners honorably but tragically recommends, is to cede to the fox full access to the hen house.
And this I cannot and will not do.
Thank you, Jim, for at least giving serious consideration to the "Doyle" hypothesis as Greg Burnham, Phil Dragoo, and I have submitted it."
====================================================================
I agree with your view of AD et. al.
I ignore the fool to deny any reaction to unending BS. At least then AD must bring his own replying poster to the thread. And only more meaningless disruption away from meaningful exchange and to disrupt common ground in the community is the fruit by which we can judge the "persons".
It is an ancient tactic of trolls to only have questions not answers or opinions that would here have to be defended and stated without agenda. Any agenda except advancing this community.
I have read way too many words of AD and the imitators here and elsewhere. Always questions of others - well meaning researchers - never anything but BS.
Mr. Drago said it before "Whatever these guys are getting paid it is too much".
Constantly quoting my posts and asking a query was a wasted effort because I had read enough of that junk to know and read the signs. The entity AD and friends were trying to provoke a reply from me. Too bad I knew that game from a decade ago. I was NOT THE DANCE PARTNER AD SOUGHT.
Too Bad, Too Sad for AD et. al.
It is enough for the moment to know the enemy.
If I operated DPF ...... oh you have my drift of thought by now.
Jim
"But speaking only for myself, I cannot in good conscience allow the "Doyle" perfidy to go unaddressed. To "ignore" "Doyle," as at least one of my dear friends and DPF co-owners honorably but tragically recommends, is to cede to the fox full access to the hen house.
And this I cannot and will not do.
Thank you, Jim, for at least giving serious consideration to the "Doyle" hypothesis as Greg Burnham, Phil Dragoo, and I have submitted it."
====================================================================
I agree with your view of AD et. al.
I ignore the fool to deny any reaction to unending BS. At least then AD must bring his own replying poster to the thread. And only more meaningless disruption away from meaningful exchange and to disrupt common ground in the community is the fruit by which we can judge the "persons".
It is an ancient tactic of trolls to only have questions not answers or opinions that would here have to be defended and stated without agenda. Any agenda except advancing this community.
I have read way too many words of AD and the imitators here and elsewhere. Always questions of others - well meaning researchers - never anything but BS.
Mr. Drago said it before "Whatever these guys are getting paid it is too much".
Constantly quoting my posts and asking a query was a wasted effort because I had read enough of that junk to know and read the signs. The entity AD and friends were trying to provoke a reply from me. Too bad I knew that game from a decade ago. I was NOT THE DANCE PARTNER AD SOUGHT.
Too Bad, Too Sad for AD et. al.
It is enough for the moment to know the enemy.
If I operated DPF ...... oh you have my drift of thought by now.
Jim