Best Spokespersons for the Truth for 50th Anniversary

[Adele Edisen]

Adele

I am sure such a team will be capable of creating an appropriate action.
A second JFK movie or at least a documentary will be necessary, bringing to life
the books and latest work of the researchers. For example Myers has created his animation
no matter how mistaken he is, Gary Mack has created the documentary "Inside the Target car"
O'Reilly wil have another, Bugliosi the same. However, i have never seen any documentary or animation being made to show the opposite view of the lone gunman theory. For example the researchers that study the Micro-Analysis of Dealey Plaza, ie the ballistics and trajectories have not done what Myers did. To present the possible scenarios etc.
The Researchers that study the Macro-Analysis of the case, like Oswald, his files, motives, sponsors etc.
should have made a documentary with their version of the story. Wealthy individuals who share the views of the JFK community could help produce it.

For example. Some months before Richard Della Rosa died i asked him the following question:

Dear Mr Della Rosa

I am currently reading the book, "The Zapruder film hoax"....In the book you discuss about the other film that you had seen that is the true account of what really happened.
I think is important to create a virtual animated computerized version so we can all see how it happened. I am surprised that all these years you have not done it.

his reply was:

That's an excellent idea. For over 20 years I did not write or speakof what I saw. I first documented my observations about 12 years
ago. A few other researchers who saw the film at different places
and different times did the same. At this late date I would be reticent
to rely on my memory to try and create a computer animation unless
it was in collaboration with some of the others. I am certain about
the high points but I do not like to rely on my memory alone, I will
discuss this with the other authors of the book and see what we can do.
Meantime please rest assured that the film depicts the descriptions of
the closest eyewitnesses.

Vasilios,

If such a film could be made, that would be wonderful. Then it could be used as a backdrop/reference for some of the Dealey Plaza witnesses. I remember that the Zapruder film did not show the motorcade's complete turn onto Elm Street from Houston Street in front of the School Book Depository Building. And it did not show the limousine making a brief, but complete, stop on Elm Street just as the President was being shot (the tail lights of the limousine were shown to be on in a single photo taken from the rear of the car, so we know it actually did stop - also from witnesses' testimony). It would also have to show that the fatal shot came from the front of the President, and the motorcycle policeman behind the President had himself and his cycle's windshield splattered by blood and brain material. That policeman's testimony was something along the idea that he, at first, thought he had been shot because the impact of the material was so strong.

I hope you and others could get in touch with the necessary people.

And speaking of Rich DellaRosa, I remember asking him if someone could duplicate the possible position of the cameraman filming the "other" film which he had seen, which meant could he detemine from his memory from where that film had been taken. As I recall, he thought the cameraman for that "other" film was not on Zapruder's pedestal, but a bit closer to the School Book Depository Building. Wasn't there a camera tripod found to the right of the pedestal inside the covered part of the portico? My memory is a bit fuzzy, but I do think he seemed to think the cameraman was in a slightly different position. I had suggested that someone with a camera should film Elm Street from Houston as if he were filmiong the motorcade to see if there might be some tiny differences in the perspective between the Zapruder film and this test film I had suggested. My idea provoked some negative reactions, so no one took it seriously and so it did not happen.

Maybe Greg Burnham and Millicent could give us some ideas, as has been suggested.

In my way of thinking about the assassination, the people who had conceived of the murder would have wanted film evidence of the most accurate kind - for a trophy, a memory...or for trainng purposes. Of course, nowadays such assassinations could be done via drones high up in the sky, making it very difficult to find out who did it.

Just maybe someone will find it amongst the papers and property of one of the plotters after their death, or their heir's death. Stranger things have happened before.

Adele