09-02-2013, 10:06 PM
Allan, et al,
Herein lies the conundrum presented knowingly and with relish by "Albert Doyle"-like entities.
To ignore their coordinated efforts to disinform is to provide safe havens for their lies and sophistries and other provocations.
To respond without acknowledging their true agendas is to support their efforts by supporting the illusion that their points are, if not sound, then at least honorably offered.
To expose and excoriate them, as I and a handful of others continue to do, is to risk estrangement from true allies and friends who cannot or will not acknowledge the ongoing hostile operations.
The only effective courses of action available to us are to expose the "Doyles" wherever and whenever they appear and then ban those identities from forum access.
I understand that they will keep coming.
They should understand that we'll be waiting for them.
"Albert Doyle" is not the first agent provocateur to penetrate DPF. "He" will not be the last.
So be it.
In closing, a simple question:
Are there any DPF members willing to come forward to argue for the legitimacy of "Albert Doyle"?
Herein lies the conundrum presented knowingly and with relish by "Albert Doyle"-like entities.
To ignore their coordinated efforts to disinform is to provide safe havens for their lies and sophistries and other provocations.
To respond without acknowledging their true agendas is to support their efforts by supporting the illusion that their points are, if not sound, then at least honorably offered.
To expose and excoriate them, as I and a handful of others continue to do, is to risk estrangement from true allies and friends who cannot or will not acknowledge the ongoing hostile operations.
The only effective courses of action available to us are to expose the "Doyles" wherever and whenever they appear and then ban those identities from forum access.
I understand that they will keep coming.
They should understand that we'll be waiting for them.
"Albert Doyle" is not the first agent provocateur to penetrate DPF. "He" will not be the last.
So be it.
In closing, a simple question:
Are there any DPF members willing to come forward to argue for the legitimacy of "Albert Doyle"?