12-02-2013, 08:59 AM
"Members, please honour our forum rules of decorum and enjoy discussions on the merits of the argument and not the people making the argument." (From the Moderators)
I translate this as - in heated debate remain civil and attack the data (or position), not the person.
I too slip and call Pose-ner and Mack sh*ts for past actions taken against truth, I cannot cast the first stone and I know it. The enemy deserves such treatment, but that doesn't make it proper to engage in that junk.:fullofit:
The divide and ruin tactic is familiar to all. Attacking each other personally promotes that division when we NEED UNITY to fight the BS attending the Media Circus of the 50th Anniversary. IMO.
The opposing view will try to shape public "discussion" to Another Damn Round of Conspiracy Debate.
There is no longer any debate of Conspiracy as fact in doubt, not after the postmortem X-Rays have been proven to be FAKES, not after all the factual information developed over the last half century.
I don't want to watch another psyops deception for this coming anniversary. We ALL have had enough of that junk.
FWIW
I translate this as - in heated debate remain civil and attack the data (or position), not the person.
I too slip and call Pose-ner and Mack sh*ts for past actions taken against truth, I cannot cast the first stone and I know it. The enemy deserves such treatment, but that doesn't make it proper to engage in that junk.:fullofit:
The divide and ruin tactic is familiar to all. Attacking each other personally promotes that division when we NEED UNITY to fight the BS attending the Media Circus of the 50th Anniversary. IMO.
The opposing view will try to shape public "discussion" to Another Damn Round of Conspiracy Debate.
There is no longer any debate of Conspiracy as fact in doubt, not after the postmortem X-Rays have been proven to be FAKES, not after all the factual information developed over the last half century.
I don't want to watch another psyops deception for this coming anniversary. We ALL have had enough of that junk.
FWIW
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON