13-02-2013, 09:24 PM
Charles Drago Wrote:My Dear Friend of the Constitution,
I share your appreciation of the clothing evidence.
Thank you, Charles. It's not a point I "debate" any longer. I simply point it out.
Quote:What I don't share is your contention -- shared by others -- that the clothing evidence is "all we need" to accomplish the tasks before us.
The SBT has been falsified.
In terms of the SBT our task is not to establish the fact, but rather to communicate it in a fashion that contributes significantly to the liberation of billions of human beings.
How?
First step: To paraphrase a sentiment that enjoyed some popularity during the recent high-spirited hijinks in Vietnam: Grab them by their souls -- as only ART can do -- and their hearts and minds will follow.
Liberté, égalité, fraternité!
To which I would add, Premier Cru Supérieur!
Interesting. I must confess I'm left without one of my glib comebacks.
The clothing evidence isn't "sexy," I'll grant you that. It's mundane. Prosaic in the extreme. That could be one reason why some people resist the notion of its primacy.
David Lifton (iirc) has an audio recording of Gaeton Fonzi's interview with Arlen Specter back in 1966. It was an ambush of Specter Fonzi planned with Vincent Salandria.
I think it would be great if a transcript of the interview were prepped, and a script boiled down and have the encounter re-created. I've heard it said that Fonzi was the inspiration for Peter Falk's Colombo, so a couple of good actors might make it work.
Fonzi wrote about the encounter here:
http://www.kenrahn.com/jfk/the_critics/f...ecter.html