15-02-2013, 07:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 15-02-2013, 08:38 PM by Charles Drago.)
One of the most frequently used, oh-so-subtle disinformation methodologies employed by the "Albert Doyle" entity is to reference offhandedly as if it were established fact an incident that remains, for honest observers, open to grave doubt.
Most recent case in point: "Doyle" notes that "Marvin witnessed" the "CIA execution" of Pitzer.
"Doyle" is either an agent provocateur sent here on a mission to inform, or a blathering idiot.
Or both.
"Albert Doyle" is a fictive construct. If you wish to respond to "him," do so only as I am doing now: by exposing the charade.
When will DPF ban this band of bastards?
Most recent case in point: "Doyle" notes that "Marvin witnessed" the "CIA execution" of Pitzer.
"Doyle" is either an agent provocateur sent here on a mission to inform, or a blathering idiot.
Or both.
"Albert Doyle" is a fictive construct. If you wish to respond to "him," do so only as I am doing now: by exposing the charade.
When will DPF ban this band of bastards?