18-02-2013, 01:57 AM
Disinformation agents often work in pairs.
Such is the case with "Betty Chruscielski" and "Albert Doyle."
For further enjoyment of the "Chruscielski"/"Doyle" tag-team, go to
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...#post61341
Further be advised that "Chruscielski" argues that JFK was shot by a gunman in the motorcade's lead car and that Greer fired the head shot.
I share with you the following observations which I made on June 6, 2011:
The Greer and Lead Car "arguments" have been exposed for what they are -- fictions designed to distract and fragment JFK assassination investigators.
Is "Betty Chruscielski" simply a well-intentioned fool? An agent of disinformation? A real person or a composite identity?
In the final analysis, "her" intentions and identity are of keen interest. But "her" presentations here must be treated with utter disdain.
Expose the falsehoods. Laugh "her" out of the room.
But under no circumstances engage "her" in debate.
If we do, then the killers of JFK win the day.
Such is the case with "Betty Chruscielski" and "Albert Doyle."
For further enjoyment of the "Chruscielski"/"Doyle" tag-team, go to
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...#post61341
Further be advised that "Chruscielski" argues that JFK was shot by a gunman in the motorcade's lead car and that Greer fired the head shot.
I share with you the following observations which I made on June 6, 2011:
The Greer and Lead Car "arguments" have been exposed for what they are -- fictions designed to distract and fragment JFK assassination investigators.
Is "Betty Chruscielski" simply a well-intentioned fool? An agent of disinformation? A real person or a composite identity?
In the final analysis, "her" intentions and identity are of keen interest. But "her" presentations here must be treated with utter disdain.
Expose the falsehoods. Laugh "her" out of the room.
But under no circumstances engage "her" in debate.
If we do, then the killers of JFK win the day.