21-03-2013, 12:05 AM
(This post was last modified: 21-03-2013, 08:57 AM by Jim Hackett II.)
No disrespect for Jim DiEugenio. In fact the opposite is true. I respect the work of this gentleman since PROBE.
Being limited to so called secondary research mostly, I confirm things for myself. Particularly when a point or issue fits my own opinion of what done what. Caution learned in that case. I don't agree with any 'researcher' completely.
When I got to the issue of McCord and Co. being evidentially tied to Banister and the Narlins crews I had to check things out for myself and I now confirmed this important connection.
Kudos to Jim DiEugenio for pointing me to this thing.
Being limited to so called secondary research mostly, I confirm things for myself. Particularly when a point or issue fits my own opinion of what done what. Caution learned in that case. I don't agree with any 'researcher' completely.
When I got to the issue of McCord and Co. being evidentially tied to Banister and the Narlins crews I had to check things out for myself and I now confirmed this important connection.
Kudos to Jim DiEugenio for pointing me to this thing.
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON