23-03-2013, 06:16 PM
Oswald and the CIA: 1995 First Ed.
JFK and Vietnam: 1992.
Spooks deserve my suspicion.
I do not mistrust the nominal employee of any of the spook houses no matter the "job description". I know well that not all spooks are as vile as Helms and Angleton.
The guard at the gate and the janitor could for all I know be an American holding the same values I do.
We all must provide our own way in the world unless you are in the "GWBush" class and were born with a silver spoon up your ***.
The analyst can be honorable too as I know well.... I give Mr. Newman the benefit of doubt but retain my skepticism of spooks.
Mr. Scott also. "The Dallas Conspiracy" should be required reading too for any interested citizen though dated.
However, to whom did the MSM and pResident GWBush turn to in seeking "evidence" to support the bogus WMD war in Iraq? The Spook Houses. And they gave the master what he needed even though it was 100% BS.
WMD across the border to Syria so they can't be found?
I said to myself "OK, but now you have to show me because I know y'all lied again".
In the end the servant cannot surpass or improve the "masters".
No one has ever faced the music for that decade old deception and "lie-stifying" for the profits of war. None but the people deployed paid anything.
I know the economy was collapsed and so forth but it ain't like eating MREs n BK Jonny Rockets and trying to keep the sand out of your chow living the war while a**holes try to kill you and yours.
Profits over people is the mantra now.
By their fruit you will know them.
Not all employees of the NSA,DIA,CIA,CID,NIS,ONI etc. are serving another master than WeThePeople.
Not all are Lansdales or Coniens. I hope.
Today I don't worry so much about the "official" spooks working for the USG, I worry about the civilian spooks following the path laid out by APinkerton in 19th Century, they are not bound by law or ethics.
By the fruit of their labor I know them.
JFK and Vietnam: 1992.
Spooks deserve my suspicion.
I do not mistrust the nominal employee of any of the spook houses no matter the "job description". I know well that not all spooks are as vile as Helms and Angleton.
The guard at the gate and the janitor could for all I know be an American holding the same values I do.
We all must provide our own way in the world unless you are in the "GWBush" class and were born with a silver spoon up your ***.
The analyst can be honorable too as I know well.... I give Mr. Newman the benefit of doubt but retain my skepticism of spooks.
Mr. Scott also. "The Dallas Conspiracy" should be required reading too for any interested citizen though dated.
However, to whom did the MSM and pResident GWBush turn to in seeking "evidence" to support the bogus WMD war in Iraq? The Spook Houses. And they gave the master what he needed even though it was 100% BS.
WMD across the border to Syria so they can't be found?
I said to myself "OK, but now you have to show me because I know y'all lied again".
In the end the servant cannot surpass or improve the "masters".
No one has ever faced the music for that decade old deception and "lie-stifying" for the profits of war. None but the people deployed paid anything.
I know the economy was collapsed and so forth but it ain't like eating MREs n BK Jonny Rockets and trying to keep the sand out of your chow living the war while a**holes try to kill you and yours.
Profits over people is the mantra now.
By their fruit you will know them.
Not all employees of the NSA,DIA,CIA,CID,NIS,ONI etc. are serving another master than WeThePeople.
Not all are Lansdales or Coniens. I hope.
Today I don't worry so much about the "official" spooks working for the USG, I worry about the civilian spooks following the path laid out by APinkerton in 19th Century, they are not bound by law or ethics.
By the fruit of their labor I know them.
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON