27-03-2013, 05:52 PM
Dawn Meredith Wrote:Get fucked "Doyle". How dare you question my honesty. I was over worked and overtired when I made that post and because Orling was mentioned IN it I missed who actually posted it. I have since apologised.
For your information I HAVE defended you. But guess what: it's over baby. No one calls me a liar
Yes I make mistakes but I also try to resolve as I did with Lauren. Since I see he/she is on here and has not acknowledged my public apology I will have zero more to say on that too.
People in the JFK research community know me and know I am honest and that I try to have people get along. I go too far in defending some.
So you have it ass backwards "Doyle", it is you who owe me the apology. I won't hold my breath.
Dawn
If you were referring to Orling as the other poster I apologize, I thought you were referring to me. Perhaps I overestimated my importance but as Don pointed-out you could hardly blame me after what I've been subjected to. However I do not back-off what I said about the source of Don's protest which you did not answer.
The facts are what matter and I feel they haven't been honestly discussed here. I feel that conflicts with the often touted at length philosophical purpose of this site. Charles is probably happy because his purpose has been satisfied however it was one whose origin was not answering a discussion of facts and I feel that is the issue here. I also feel ordinary discussion of those facts does not deserve the heat it created in response. It's a waste of the site's time and space and wrong mostly because it is the direct result of a false issue created by a member in order to avoid perfectly legitimate discussion of an unpopular subject. This all could have been avoided by certain posters honestly answering a few simple points.