28-03-2013, 08:32 PM
(This post was last modified: 28-03-2013, 08:55 PM by Gordon Gray.)
David Josephs Wrote:Whatever you say GG."No Parkland observer placed the wound solely anteriorly on the right side. (Adolph Giesecke, MD felt the wound extended from occiput to the front, but on the left side.) Given Mrs. Kennedy's recollection of "holding the top of his head down" it may well be that the wound did extend more anteriorly than was apparent to Parkland witnesses. This might be explained by a blood clot forming en route from Dealey Plaza to Parkland while Mrs. Kennedy held "the top" of JFK's "head down" causing the more anterior extent of the wound to be unappreciated by the emergency personnel" Aguilar: http://www.assassinationweb.com/ag6.htm In addition there's Robinson's testimony: Robinson was also one of the several witnesses who Horne names who saw a wound in the temple near the hairline that was small enough to be hidden by hair. This latter description also guarantees this was an entry wound. Robinson said this wound "did not have to be hidden by make-up, and was simply plugged by him with some wax during the reconstruction." http://www.ctka.net/reviews/horne_jd_2.html My question for you : are you claiming that the black spot on his frontal bone is a entrance wound? Sometimes it seems you are and sometimes it doesn't. Which is it?
Now... why again does no one note this either at Parkland or Bethesda? and why refer me to Aguilar when he has nothing to say on the subject?
Just answer the questions this time GG... I think we've beat anatomy to death
Cheers
DJ