03-05-2013, 12:56 PM
I realize that there is a sort of black and white divide with respect to the nature of the involvement of intel (alphabets). One camp sees all the events a detailed planned conspiracies executed (choreographed) by intel who are operating presumably for their *masters* and are essentially the managers and supply the mechanics and of course the cover stories. This would be the MIHOP position.
At the other extreme there is the sort of case that intel is simply a bumbling bureaucracy which can't catch a criminal or stop a crime if they were present when it was committed. This is the incompetence argument and some complain that even at this level there has been no accountability which would confirm that the peformance was incompetence not intentional.
Then there is something in the middle which has now been called LIHOP. There is some confusion about what the IT actually is. And of course what the LET actually means. We've learned that the alphabets culture relationships with shady characters all over the place. The naive view of this is to listen in on them and catch their nasty plans before they go operational. But we also have ample evidence that FBI, at least, actually participates in these plots... helping with bomb making and so forth (1993 wtc)... and the series of caught terrorists post 9/11 in the USA. These incidents are clearly more than a LIHOP... and very close to MIHOP. Were the patsy perps of the mind to commit the acts without being directed by the alphabets? Or perhaps the alphabet has infiltrated the so called terrorists groups and have handlers within selecting and then directing the patsy. FBI is knowledgeable and or tipped off so that they can sting the operation... and score PR points... and get congress and the people and of course the lamestream media on board... not to mention more funding and more leeway in their operations... post proven successful stings. Entrapment/stings are considered to be legitimate tools in fighting crime and *terrorism*.
There is the notion that terrorism (and some crimes) can be prevented from taking place by engaging in infiltration, using double agents and so forth. But aside from the sort of drone strikes which target supposedly suspected bad guys who are not engaged in any criminal activity... stings require that the crime be in progress to achieve the desired purpose... PR for the agency, and supposedly to send a message to those who think that they can get away with similar.. Hahaha.. lookie here... we can catch you in the act!
Boston appears to be some sort of sting. It has all the tell tale signs. But was there a larger purpose? It was admitted that drills were conducted. Drills are OK because they make the JTTF and so forth prepared for the real deal... supposedly. Yet stings are largely conducted in the dark with little to no transparency even after the fact. The claim is that they can't compromise assets and tactics. How clever! So we can never know WHO is hired to work on these sorts of black ops / stings and what WAS the exercise. We're not allowed to know any details... just the broadest strokes.
What did they drill? We can only guess. They sure drilled the use of troops for martial law and lock down. How absurd the show of force to capture a 19yr old. They drill use of the media to float all manner of stories and evidence delivered by police and FBI... all unsourced and unquestioned yet reported to the world. They clearly seemed to have drilled the use of private security which they are refusing to fess up to despite the mounds of actual evidence of Kraft's involvement. The drill appears to have included a bomb going off and actors who were supposed to be injured. That is becoming abundantly clear. But could they get away with no real injuries? Probably not. So perhaps a real small bomb or two were used to make the drill more realistic. The two suspects appear to be patsies in on the drill who probably were not thinking their bombs would be detonated but were perhaps supposed to be caught by sniffer dogs??? But we'll likely not find out because we may never get a trial if the defendant is forced to take a plea deal to save his life and insure his silence in a super max.
Larger political motive? Identifying the perps from the Caucuses sure opens this region to the US to legitimately engage in operations for *national security* as this region has now produced enemies of the state. The region was formerly and presently in the Russian (USSR) sphere of influence. This domestic false flag may be the entry of the empire's open involvement in the Caucuses and pitting it against the Russia. Oh goodie! A further basis for arming up the MIC.
It should be interesting to follow some of the *victims* and see if they turn out to be part of the part of the drill. And will Kraft's role get some sunlight? They've been caught on camera and this evidence will not go away. Was this a drill some group decided take live and push the goals of the drill further... martial law.. etc. And of course was this a distraction allowing something else to take place with no one paying attention? Will the press continued to be fractured into stenographers reporting for officials (usually unnamed)... and outlier indie media which will be further marginalized as giving a platform for conspiracy nuts? What will the alt media which has not gone all the way to the Alex Jones territory going to do? How hard will they push for an investigation and answers to some very good questions that have been raised by the crowd sourced sleuths? Will the likes of Hedges, Greenwald, Goodman and Palast remain quiet and fall in behind the FBI released narrative?
Who comes up with these attacks? What is the presumed motive? And more importantly... what was the real motive?
At the other extreme there is the sort of case that intel is simply a bumbling bureaucracy which can't catch a criminal or stop a crime if they were present when it was committed. This is the incompetence argument and some complain that even at this level there has been no accountability which would confirm that the peformance was incompetence not intentional.
Then there is something in the middle which has now been called LIHOP. There is some confusion about what the IT actually is. And of course what the LET actually means. We've learned that the alphabets culture relationships with shady characters all over the place. The naive view of this is to listen in on them and catch their nasty plans before they go operational. But we also have ample evidence that FBI, at least, actually participates in these plots... helping with bomb making and so forth (1993 wtc)... and the series of caught terrorists post 9/11 in the USA. These incidents are clearly more than a LIHOP... and very close to MIHOP. Were the patsy perps of the mind to commit the acts without being directed by the alphabets? Or perhaps the alphabet has infiltrated the so called terrorists groups and have handlers within selecting and then directing the patsy. FBI is knowledgeable and or tipped off so that they can sting the operation... and score PR points... and get congress and the people and of course the lamestream media on board... not to mention more funding and more leeway in their operations... post proven successful stings. Entrapment/stings are considered to be legitimate tools in fighting crime and *terrorism*.
There is the notion that terrorism (and some crimes) can be prevented from taking place by engaging in infiltration, using double agents and so forth. But aside from the sort of drone strikes which target supposedly suspected bad guys who are not engaged in any criminal activity... stings require that the crime be in progress to achieve the desired purpose... PR for the agency, and supposedly to send a message to those who think that they can get away with similar.. Hahaha.. lookie here... we can catch you in the act!
Boston appears to be some sort of sting. It has all the tell tale signs. But was there a larger purpose? It was admitted that drills were conducted. Drills are OK because they make the JTTF and so forth prepared for the real deal... supposedly. Yet stings are largely conducted in the dark with little to no transparency even after the fact. The claim is that they can't compromise assets and tactics. How clever! So we can never know WHO is hired to work on these sorts of black ops / stings and what WAS the exercise. We're not allowed to know any details... just the broadest strokes.
What did they drill? We can only guess. They sure drilled the use of troops for martial law and lock down. How absurd the show of force to capture a 19yr old. They drill use of the media to float all manner of stories and evidence delivered by police and FBI... all unsourced and unquestioned yet reported to the world. They clearly seemed to have drilled the use of private security which they are refusing to fess up to despite the mounds of actual evidence of Kraft's involvement. The drill appears to have included a bomb going off and actors who were supposed to be injured. That is becoming abundantly clear. But could they get away with no real injuries? Probably not. So perhaps a real small bomb or two were used to make the drill more realistic. The two suspects appear to be patsies in on the drill who probably were not thinking their bombs would be detonated but were perhaps supposed to be caught by sniffer dogs??? But we'll likely not find out because we may never get a trial if the defendant is forced to take a plea deal to save his life and insure his silence in a super max.
Larger political motive? Identifying the perps from the Caucuses sure opens this region to the US to legitimately engage in operations for *national security* as this region has now produced enemies of the state. The region was formerly and presently in the Russian (USSR) sphere of influence. This domestic false flag may be the entry of the empire's open involvement in the Caucuses and pitting it against the Russia. Oh goodie! A further basis for arming up the MIC.
It should be interesting to follow some of the *victims* and see if they turn out to be part of the part of the drill. And will Kraft's role get some sunlight? They've been caught on camera and this evidence will not go away. Was this a drill some group decided take live and push the goals of the drill further... martial law.. etc. And of course was this a distraction allowing something else to take place with no one paying attention? Will the press continued to be fractured into stenographers reporting for officials (usually unnamed)... and outlier indie media which will be further marginalized as giving a platform for conspiracy nuts? What will the alt media which has not gone all the way to the Alex Jones territory going to do? How hard will they push for an investigation and answers to some very good questions that have been raised by the crowd sourced sleuths? Will the likes of Hedges, Greenwald, Goodman and Palast remain quiet and fall in behind the FBI released narrative?
Who comes up with these attacks? What is the presumed motive? And more importantly... what was the real motive?