06-05-2013, 05:03 PM
There is a big difference between ANGLE OF ENTRY and the ANGLE OF THE WOUND....
Since this bullet was traveling so slowly by comparison, it is very possible that the nose turned downward upon impact and it entered and coursed downward at 45+ degrees...
Does not mean the SHOT was taken from that angle at all.... Especially if we are saying the bullet did not transit, which it did not.
The expectation of STRAIGHT LINES when applied to bullet wounds thru and thru is a bit of a large jump. If real FMJ bullets were used with a hi velocity rifle - another story.
But they were not.
Remember the premise... "WE will be incharge of ALL the evidence.. What WE SAY is evidence will be evidence" do you think there was much concern over where the shots came from or the caliber of the bullets?
DJ
Since this bullet was traveling so slowly by comparison, it is very possible that the nose turned downward upon impact and it entered and coursed downward at 45+ degrees...
Does not mean the SHOT was taken from that angle at all.... Especially if we are saying the bullet did not transit, which it did not.
The expectation of STRAIGHT LINES when applied to bullet wounds thru and thru is a bit of a large jump. If real FMJ bullets were used with a hi velocity rifle - another story.
But they were not.
Remember the premise... "WE will be incharge of ALL the evidence.. What WE SAY is evidence will be evidence" do you think there was much concern over where the shots came from or the caliber of the bullets?
DJ
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter