The disappearance of the photographers' vehicle

[Gordon Gray]

The question is how complicit were the SS, if at all, or were they manipulated by someone higher up?

I would submit the qualified answer of "yes."

I've written often about the dangers inherent in referencing THE Secret Service or THE CIA or THE military in our analyses.

So to, for another example, THE U.S. government.

When we use language that would promote the inference that those organizational entities were/are operationally and ideologically monolithic, we obscure rather than illuminate the conspiracy's structure.

Am I splitting hairs? I don't think so.

Compartmentalization, the need-to-know. It's how the Defense Industry, the Pentagon, the intelligence community and the Mafia all function. The Manhattan Project was enormous but the secret was kept because every little worker did his tiny, compartmentalized job, didn't ask questions, and wasn't allowed to see the whole picture.

No Doubt. But someone in authority with the SS had to approve the plans to pull back the security for the Dallas motorcade. Once the word was passed down, then of course people simply followed orders, even though it is apparent that some realized they were dangerous. My question is; did some one with the authority to speak for the White House pass on the word to the head of the President's detail, that he President wanted more visibility in Dallas and therefore could the security be pulled back in these specific ways, or was some one in authority with the SS knowingly involved in the plot?