24-06-2013, 09:10 PM
Richard Hawking:
The question regarding the Press, or any one of the above items, standing alone, could be considered a coincidence.
But viewed together as a group, they lend themselves to a conclusion of arrangements and careful planning.
A single incident in isolation--that is the intent of all official "investigations" and commentary:
To so constrict the viewing portal as to remove all context.
For such reasons we applaud Douglass' Unspeakable
And recognized Dulles' snort, "the head could be spinning for all I see. . .were they smoking up there?"
The entire op is in the tenor of an historic phrase:
But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism--
What are we to believe:
Their repeated appeals to coincidence,
or our lying eyes?
Hawking's Thesis:
[S]tanding alone, could be considered a coincidence[, b]ut viewed together as a group, they lend themselves to a conclusion of arrangements and careful planning.
The question regarding the Press, or any one of the above items, standing alone, could be considered a coincidence.
But viewed together as a group, they lend themselves to a conclusion of arrangements and careful planning.
A single incident in isolation--that is the intent of all official "investigations" and commentary:
To so constrict the viewing portal as to remove all context.
For such reasons we applaud Douglass' Unspeakable
And recognized Dulles' snort, "the head could be spinning for all I see. . .were they smoking up there?"
The entire op is in the tenor of an historic phrase:
But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism--
What are we to believe:
Their repeated appeals to coincidence,
or our lying eyes?
Hawking's Thesis:
[S]tanding alone, could be considered a coincidence[, b]ut viewed together as a group, they lend themselves to a conclusion of arrangements and careful planning.