27-06-2013, 12:44 PM
This holds part of the trig data I am looking for or was...
Now I have to get to the CAD I was fiddling with.
I won't do a "disney" cartoon job, I wanna know though for my own satisfaction too.
Limited to 2D as I won't get off a chunk of change for that module.
Before this CAD was a model aircraft piece of software.
Then got started with this idea (south knoll sniper position)
Still able to do plan view for top down and the horizontal separate docs.
correlation accurate to tolerance of original plat I base this on.
Use of WC plat(s) or Cutler plat is a question.
P.S. Safety glass would not interfere with NATO 5.56 mm ammo at ranges involved.
Junkyard testing and taking out interior features of upholstery at 75 yards no scope,
I wanted to see this happen whatever the results.
If I were such an operative this would never have stopped the shot from being taken.
Deflected? Possible yes, probable no.
Not that I could tell, I could see the vapor condensed in the air behind the round.
I could never be such an operative for any other's cause or job.
[SPECULATION ALERT]
The job I figure was done with a Sniper version of the M-14 - 7.62 silenced hence subsonic but throwing mass large.
In that case the safety glass would not have mattered in the slightest IMHO,
but I haven't seen those tests nor conducted them myself.
Not speculatively,
Anyway best regards.
Now I have to get to the CAD I was fiddling with.
I won't do a "disney" cartoon job, I wanna know though for my own satisfaction too.
Limited to 2D as I won't get off a chunk of change for that module.
Before this CAD was a model aircraft piece of software.
Then got started with this idea (south knoll sniper position)
Still able to do plan view for top down and the horizontal separate docs.
correlation accurate to tolerance of original plat I base this on.
Use of WC plat(s) or Cutler plat is a question.
P.S. Safety glass would not interfere with NATO 5.56 mm ammo at ranges involved.
Junkyard testing and taking out interior features of upholstery at 75 yards no scope,
I wanted to see this happen whatever the results.
If I were such an operative this would never have stopped the shot from being taken.
Deflected? Possible yes, probable no.
Not that I could tell, I could see the vapor condensed in the air behind the round.
I could never be such an operative for any other's cause or job.
[SPECULATION ALERT]
The job I figure was done with a Sniper version of the M-14 - 7.62 silenced hence subsonic but throwing mass large.
In that case the safety glass would not have mattered in the slightest IMHO,
but I haven't seen those tests nor conducted them myself.
Not speculatively,
Anyway best regards.
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON