05-08-2013, 10:04 PM
It's good to see you here Rob, yet your series about sinking the WC conclusions is WAY beyond preaching to the choir here....
There are few if any WCR apologists here.... I'm a friend and supporter of your posting and contributions Rob... but I am sure you will be met with great amounts of silence here if you feel it your duty to ONCE AGAIN lay out the WCR shortcomings and explain it to us as if we were the same bunch of bewildered sheep hunting and pecking on that other Forum. (Giving it it's due... the imagery analysis and reconstruction accomplished on that Forum is at times simply amazing. The work of Chris Davidson from the initial work of Tom Purvis has helped me understand how the Zfilm and other films were manipulated and are able to sync)
The Cointelpro techniques utilized by a handful of LNer posters on that forum is so obvious as to be absurd.
The vigilance against and awareness of those that only disrupt... or come with an obvious agenda based on these techniques are simply not tolerated here.... and it's a welcome sanctuary.
There's disagreement here for sure.... but not over whether the WCR was the POS it was... or the HSCA and other related attempts to cover-up were what they are....
So I'd suggest Rob, that you take a little time and acquaint yourself with the key players here, their POV's and their styles.
They have helped me see past the minutia (ala Salandria) and concentrate on the details of the cover-up/conspiracy as opposed to the daunting task of piecing together a 1000 puzzle from a barrel of 100,000 pieces... not knowing if ANY of the Original 1000 pieces from the puzzle are even there.
Who created the 1000 piece puzzle....
who removed/replaced the actual pieces with those we have now... and
who added the other 90,000 pieces to hide what was left of the 1000.... ?
.... and then. Who told them to do it, when and how.
The enjoyment of reading threads here is unmatched anywhere....
IMO, your contributions will be viewed and commented upon as long as it's not about that which is so painfully obvious.
Based on the evidence Rob, we both know that CE399 came into being in the office of Director Rowley... ARRB's MD149 states that Johnson brought CE399 to "BULAB" (FBI/Frazier)... yet the puzzle pieces tell us that Todd got it from Rowley and brought it to Frazier...(MD149 surfaces 35 years later) The telex reiterates the shallow, non-transiting back wound where a bullet falls out of the wound. We KNOW this. But this CAN'T be CE399...
The real question is WHO shot the bullet into water, WHEN, and how did it get to Rowley to give to Todd...... all evidence of advanced planning. With CE399 in the record and no other contrary evidence... the FACILITATORS got what they wanted... evidence in the record tying the rifle to Oswald and the bullet to the rifle.
Authenticating the details of this, or any other theory, is what makes this forum so special IMO....
Cheers
DJ
There are few if any WCR apologists here.... I'm a friend and supporter of your posting and contributions Rob... but I am sure you will be met with great amounts of silence here if you feel it your duty to ONCE AGAIN lay out the WCR shortcomings and explain it to us as if we were the same bunch of bewildered sheep hunting and pecking on that other Forum. (Giving it it's due... the imagery analysis and reconstruction accomplished on that Forum is at times simply amazing. The work of Chris Davidson from the initial work of Tom Purvis has helped me understand how the Zfilm and other films were manipulated and are able to sync)
The Cointelpro techniques utilized by a handful of LNer posters on that forum is so obvious as to be absurd.
The vigilance against and awareness of those that only disrupt... or come with an obvious agenda based on these techniques are simply not tolerated here.... and it's a welcome sanctuary.
There's disagreement here for sure.... but not over whether the WCR was the POS it was... or the HSCA and other related attempts to cover-up were what they are....
So I'd suggest Rob, that you take a little time and acquaint yourself with the key players here, their POV's and their styles.
They have helped me see past the minutia (ala Salandria) and concentrate on the details of the cover-up/conspiracy as opposed to the daunting task of piecing together a 1000 puzzle from a barrel of 100,000 pieces... not knowing if ANY of the Original 1000 pieces from the puzzle are even there.
Who created the 1000 piece puzzle....
who removed/replaced the actual pieces with those we have now... and
who added the other 90,000 pieces to hide what was left of the 1000.... ?
.... and then. Who told them to do it, when and how.
The enjoyment of reading threads here is unmatched anywhere....
IMO, your contributions will be viewed and commented upon as long as it's not about that which is so painfully obvious.
Based on the evidence Rob, we both know that CE399 came into being in the office of Director Rowley... ARRB's MD149 states that Johnson brought CE399 to "BULAB" (FBI/Frazier)... yet the puzzle pieces tell us that Todd got it from Rowley and brought it to Frazier...(MD149 surfaces 35 years later) The telex reiterates the shallow, non-transiting back wound where a bullet falls out of the wound. We KNOW this. But this CAN'T be CE399...
The real question is WHO shot the bullet into water, WHEN, and how did it get to Rowley to give to Todd...... all evidence of advanced planning. With CE399 in the record and no other contrary evidence... the FACILITATORS got what they wanted... evidence in the record tying the rifle to Oswald and the bullet to the rifle.
Authenticating the details of this, or any other theory, is what makes this forum so special IMO....
Cheers
DJ
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter