08-08-2013, 09:06 PM
Some time ago I concluded that the fatal flaw in Chomsky's JFK-related analyses was his (NC's) unwillingness/inability to factor into his observations the admittedly non-quantifiable phenomenon that is best understood as enlightenment.
(The anti-Chomsky in this regard is, of course, James Douglass.)
Chomsky's conclusion that JFK came to and left the stage as a committed Cold Warrior is a product of such thinking -- not to mention an indication of rather primitive deep political research skills.
(The anti-Chomsky in this regard is, of course, James Douglass.)
Chomsky's conclusion that JFK came to and left the stage as a committed Cold Warrior is a product of such thinking -- not to mention an indication of rather primitive deep political research skills.