20-08-2013, 11:01 PM
Raising the political cost..... We need to openly make the issue of a publication's credibility an issue, if they go ahead and publish sewage. If we just note how bad it is to ourselves, it does not matter. We need to let them know "if you do this , it is going to have a political cost"
How will that cost be created? It depends on how widely you copy and paste it and WHERE you decide to copy and paste it. I am a member of over 100 FB groups. Sometimes I post something on most of those groups. What if 4 more people did that? Then you are talking exponential impact.
------
Dear SLATE:
Mistake or disinformation? Given the context I lean towards disinformation.
"First of all, the main point about Carolyn Arnold's submerged story is not that it was apparently never given to the Warren Commission. Its not even that it tends to be exculpatory of Oswald. Rosenbaum notes those aspects. The key point about Arnold is this: The FBI changed her statement. In other words, they altered evidence in a murder case. When Anthony Summers interviewed Arnold in 1978, five years before Rosenbaum's article appeared, she was immediately taken aback by what the report said. The FBI had written that, from outside the depository, she "thought she caught a fleeting glimpse of Lee Harvey Oswald standing in the hallway". (Summers, Conspiracy, p. 77) Before Summers could even describe why her statement was important, the witness insisted this was not what she told the Bureau. First, she knew Oswald since he had come to her more than once for change. Secondly, she did not catch a glimpse of him from outside. At about 12:15 or later, she went into the lunchroom on the second floor and saw Oswald sitting in one of the booth seats on the right side of the room. Pretty nonchalant behavior for a murderer planning to be upstairs on the sixth floor in about five minutes setting up his boxes as a barricade, piecing together his rifle, loading a magazine, and lining up his target."-- CTKA, Ron Rosenbaum Fires The First Salvo..
How will that cost be created? It depends on how widely you copy and paste it and WHERE you decide to copy and paste it. I am a member of over 100 FB groups. Sometimes I post something on most of those groups. What if 4 more people did that? Then you are talking exponential impact.
------
Dear SLATE:
Mistake or disinformation? Given the context I lean towards disinformation.
"First of all, the main point about Carolyn Arnold's submerged story is not that it was apparently never given to the Warren Commission. Its not even that it tends to be exculpatory of Oswald. Rosenbaum notes those aspects. The key point about Arnold is this: The FBI changed her statement. In other words, they altered evidence in a murder case. When Anthony Summers interviewed Arnold in 1978, five years before Rosenbaum's article appeared, she was immediately taken aback by what the report said. The FBI had written that, from outside the depository, she "thought she caught a fleeting glimpse of Lee Harvey Oswald standing in the hallway". (Summers, Conspiracy, p. 77) Before Summers could even describe why her statement was important, the witness insisted this was not what she told the Bureau. First, she knew Oswald since he had come to her more than once for change. Secondly, she did not catch a glimpse of him from outside. At about 12:15 or later, she went into the lunchroom on the second floor and saw Oswald sitting in one of the booth seats on the right side of the room. Pretty nonchalant behavior for a murderer planning to be upstairs on the sixth floor in about five minutes setting up his boxes as a barricade, piecing together his rifle, loading a magazine, and lining up his target."-- CTKA, Ron Rosenbaum Fires The First Salvo..