29-09-2013, 01:57 PM
I have to take issue with a couple of things he wrote:
First, it could never have been used as evidence in a court of law since its chain of possession was so clearly broken. Only Oswald's murder, in police custody, allowed the film to be treated as "evidence", by the establishment media. It would have been thrown out of court if the accused had been allowed a trial.
But it was used as evidence in the Shaw trial, shown to the jury, and identified by Zapruder as the film he shot.
Second, in the possession of the Secret Service and the FBI, the Zapruder film was damaged and frames were lost.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure it was the original film that was damaged while it was in LIFE's possession, not the SS/FBI copies.
First, it could never have been used as evidence in a court of law since its chain of possession was so clearly broken. Only Oswald's murder, in police custody, allowed the film to be treated as "evidence", by the establishment media. It would have been thrown out of court if the accused had been allowed a trial.
But it was used as evidence in the Shaw trial, shown to the jury, and identified by Zapruder as the film he shot.
Second, in the possession of the Secret Service and the FBI, the Zapruder film was damaged and frames were lost.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure it was the original film that was damaged while it was in LIFE's possession, not the SS/FBI copies.