The Must-Read List

[Paul Rigby]

Hi Paul

Nice to have you back - and here-here to all that.

It's also a pretty accurate analogy for ALL 'deep events', to use the terminology PD-S now prefers. Opposition to the 'official narrative' is lead by the manipulable and, by the intent and hidden steering of the manipulators, develops its own set of confusing dogmas and anathemas. Dissenters are riven by petty squabbles and easily demoralised - and so it goes on with, at best, an ever-so-gradual revision to the ON - excepting the 'articles of faith' of course - like 'Churchill was a hero'.

Reciprocated, Peter.

Of course, what is axiomatic to thee and thou is not to others; and is, in any case, a subject both fraught with peril - one man's hero-researcher is another's blatant fraud - and properly conducted on a different thread.

But I agree wholeheartedly. To adapt Salandria's dictum about the nature of the conspiracy, the research community was itself constructed to fall apart.

Must dust off those notes about Trevor-Roper - it could scarcely be more brazen, and opens up a view of the degree of British intelligence complicity in the cover-up.

If only we had democracy here, we could push for some serious questions to be asked.

Neither of us will holding our breath on that count.

Paul