30-10-2013, 09:17 PM
I am bumping this thread in light of a very interesting exchange that is taking place right now on the EF, featuring Zach Robertson, James Richards and others.
Zach has highlighted a very intriguing and incriminating piece of marginalia (from a document cited in Larry Hancock's Nexus) relating to John Martino; a figure who appears to link directly to both the Facilitator and Mechanic levels of the plot.
The note in question also appears to incriminate Joe Molina.
Researcher Lee Farley has done some very good work on Joe Molina and William Lowery, including the following post, which I hope he doesn't mind me reproducing here:
William Lowery outed himself as an FBI informant on September 26th, 1963; six days after Richard Case Nagell was arrested for firing shots into the wall of a bank in El Paso.
There are very few degrees of separation between these people and Oswald, Ruby, and potentially a team or teams of anti-Castro Cuban assassins.
So I suppose the question is: do we have here a smoking gun, a red herring, or both? And does this lend further credence to the hypothesis at the heart of this thread? I'm going to say: yes.
Zach has highlighted a very intriguing and incriminating piece of marginalia (from a document cited in Larry Hancock's Nexus) relating to John Martino; a figure who appears to link directly to both the Facilitator and Mechanic levels of the plot.
The note in question also appears to incriminate Joe Molina.
Researcher Lee Farley has done some very good work on Joe Molina and William Lowery, including the following post, which I hope he doesn't mind me reproducing here:
In addition to Molina very quickly contacting Bill Lowery after the assassination there was an interview conducted on November 23, with Virgie Mae Rackley by members of the Dallas Police Vice section that was sent to Captain Gannaway.
During the interview Ms. Rackley was asked if she had "any suspicions of any of the employees she worked with. She stated "no". After a few moments she stated "It may sound silly and I shouldn't say anything at all, but my boss, Joe Molina, has had a number of strange telephone conversations. I never have listened to the conversations, but recently I heard him say something about he was going to help somebody 'do it'"
You and I have had many conversations about how November 22, 1963 was a day of many "unusual occurrences". Here is another "unusual occurrence". November 22 was the first time that Joe Molina ate his lunch with other employees. He ate his lunch for the first time with Virgie Rackley and two other TSBD employees. According to Rackley he usually ate lunch by himself.
During the interview Ms. Rackley was asked if she had "any suspicions of any of the employees she worked with. She stated "no". After a few moments she stated "It may sound silly and I shouldn't say anything at all, but my boss, Joe Molina, has had a number of strange telephone conversations. I never have listened to the conversations, but recently I heard him say something about he was going to help somebody 'do it'"
You and I have had many conversations about how November 22, 1963 was a day of many "unusual occurrences". Here is another "unusual occurrence". November 22 was the first time that Joe Molina ate his lunch with other employees. He ate his lunch for the first time with Virgie Rackley and two other TSBD employees. According to Rackley he usually ate lunch by himself.
William Lowery outed himself as an FBI informant on September 26th, 1963; six days after Richard Case Nagell was arrested for firing shots into the wall of a bank in El Paso.
There are very few degrees of separation between these people and Oswald, Ruby, and potentially a team or teams of anti-Castro Cuban assassins.
So I suppose the question is: do we have here a smoking gun, a red herring, or both? And does this lend further credence to the hypothesis at the heart of this thread? I'm going to say: yes.
“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.â€
― Leo Tolstoy,
― Leo Tolstoy,