02-11-2013, 05:13 PM
In the original book entitled Conspiracy, Summers' clearly outlines outlines a plot to kill Kennedy.
That plot includes segments of the Mafia, the CIA and Cuban exiles. Its the plot described by Jim Garrison is his interview with Russell in, I think Harper's in 1976.
Now, if your book is about that, and in fact that is what Conspiracy is about, then what is so bad about the title? Why change it to some nebulous, indefinite saying by Warren which translates into:
WE ARE NEVER GOING TO KNOW WHAT HAPPENED!
Know what I say to that? Horse crap.
Summers' book, which I liked in its original form, in its various revisions, has become weaker and weaker as time has gone on. I couldn't even read the thing by the nineties. It had become that diluted.
This is what happens when one is concerned with being an MSM darling. Which he has always been.
And one other thing: according to Paul Hoch, Summers was instrumental in putting together the Bugliosi/Spence debacle in London. Thanks Tony.
That plot includes segments of the Mafia, the CIA and Cuban exiles. Its the plot described by Jim Garrison is his interview with Russell in, I think Harper's in 1976.
Now, if your book is about that, and in fact that is what Conspiracy is about, then what is so bad about the title? Why change it to some nebulous, indefinite saying by Warren which translates into:
WE ARE NEVER GOING TO KNOW WHAT HAPPENED!
Know what I say to that? Horse crap.
Summers' book, which I liked in its original form, in its various revisions, has become weaker and weaker as time has gone on. I couldn't even read the thing by the nineties. It had become that diluted.
This is what happens when one is concerned with being an MSM darling. Which he has always been.
And one other thing: according to Paul Hoch, Summers was instrumental in putting together the Bugliosi/Spence debacle in London. Thanks Tony.