07-11-2013, 12:38 AM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:...more than around the block 'a few times'..... No one group of any name pulled off the JFK Assassination, IMO, after decades of research and reading. It was a coalition of mutual interests and benefits. Such simplistic terms as 'NWO' to explain such a complex event is, just that, simplistic. It is either done out of naivete, or [not saying in this case] similar are often done to discredit a Forum. Beware the 22nd of November is upon us and all sorts of interesting things are coming fore.....I hadn't heard of the NWO before tis thread(not withstanding GHW's quote at the fall of the Soviet Union. But in what way is it a more simplistic notion than "the Sponsors"? Has any one described them other than in nebulous terms?
The terms such as 'NWO' are so nebulous, no one has / no one can have any idea[s] as to who [persons or entities] is/are/were involved. Mostly, such nebulous terms are used and spread as disinformation to make real researchers look silly, IMO.
Please, newbees, this is a small and an advanced forum. Newbees are welcome here. Sunstein agents are not. [if you don't know what is meant here, look on the internet or ask]. Take some time to look around at posts on the topic[s] you plan to post upon, and be as specific and instructional as possible - not just plunging in without seeing if there is any 'water' in your 'pool'.