11-11-2013, 11:25 PM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Tracy Riddle Wrote:I guess I'm missing the new evidence here. The Wiegman (not Weigman) film has been known for a long time. In many of the color photos taken right after the assassination (Wilma Bond, James Towner, Arthur Rickerby, Phil Willis), you can see a tree in that location and its foliage is turning light orange-brown. This is almost certainly the "smoke" seen in a couple of frames of the B&W Wiegman film. Unless the team behind the knoll was using an 18th century musket. If there really was such a huge cloud of smoke, it would have been seen by everyone in the plaza.
Before I get called a disinformation shill by anyone, I think it's likely there were shooters on both the South and North knolls, and a few witnesses did see a whisp of smoke which very well could have come from a cigarette. One witness did report seeing cigarette butts all over the area behind the fence where the muddy footprints were.
Sorry, while I don't think you're a disinformation shill, and there were teams on the N. and S. Knoll [as well as 3-4 other locations, IMO], its likely too much 'smoke' from a sharpshooter's kill weapon; but WAY TOO MUCH to be cigarette smoke!!!!!
It's something other, methinks.....................::
Ok, I must not have made myself clear enough.
What we see in the Wiegman film is almost certainly not smoke; it's foliage from a tree that's turning orange-brown.
The smoke other witnesses saw was not captured on film.