17-11-2013, 02:57 PM
Oh, he's still pretty sharp. He was on his game at at the Wecht Conference.
LHO can never be made out to be the assassin because the science precludes him.
Thanks to the "Law & Order" / "CSI" cultural phenom, the fact that Oswald had no paraffin test markings on his face definitively proves that he could not have shot this old rifle that showers gunsmoke residue everywhere ~ especially onto a shooters face which would have been touching the rifle or very, very close to it at firing. Also, LHO had a palm print on the rifle ~ FOUND AFTER ~ The FBI found none and the Dallas Police re-fingerprinted the rifle AFTER Oswald's death. To that end, the palm print was found in a backwards position on the rifle for Oswald to even use it for firing! And finally, the scope on the rifle was defective and I have read that it was a scope for a LEFT HANDED SHOT!
LHO can never be made out to be the assassin because the science precludes him.
Thanks to the "Law & Order" / "CSI" cultural phenom, the fact that Oswald had no paraffin test markings on his face definitively proves that he could not have shot this old rifle that showers gunsmoke residue everywhere ~ especially onto a shooters face which would have been touching the rifle or very, very close to it at firing. Also, LHO had a palm print on the rifle ~ FOUND AFTER ~ The FBI found none and the Dallas Police re-fingerprinted the rifle AFTER Oswald's death. To that end, the palm print was found in a backwards position on the rifle for Oswald to even use it for firing! And finally, the scope on the rifle was defective and I have read that it was a scope for a LEFT HANDED SHOT!
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Thompson's 'stand' the last few decades is deeply troubling and ever changing. That he even thinks that Oswald shot anyone from anywhere is deeply disturbing and IMO disqualifies what ever else he might have to say from serious consideration. Now, he seems to also believe someone else [or Oswald with his superhero fast footwork?] also shot from the N. Knoll. Hard to tell if he is getting senile, was always a bit crazy or acting as a disinfo/confusion agent. The more different and divergent theories put out there, the more the Truth his diluted - this has been the MAIN tactic of the people behind the Big Lies of Dallas....the 'Oswald did it alone' gambit/lie a distant second. Recent evidence and research that is getting harder and harder to cover-up and deny clearly show [as it has shown from day 1!] that there were more than three shots and they came from multiple [more than 2!] directions. Nothing shows - in fact everything I've seen and studied shows negative that Oswald was on the 6th floor, near any window, with any rifle or fired any shots. But a patsy is no good for the real perpetrators if not billed forever as the patsy...no matter what truths, facts, evidence, etc. has to be twisted, invented, suppressed, et al. And to think it was his book Six Seconds in Dallas that was the first book to really draw me into a formal study of the case........ Sad, but he is only one of many people either knowingly or coincidentally aiding the Big Lie. They get big play on the MSM, but Truth always trumps chumps.