19-11-2013, 04:06 PM
Matthews' position basically, is that since the motorcade route was changed to pass in front of Oswald's place of employment, it must have been a crime of opportunity - not a conspiracy.
His reasoning of course, necessarily assumes as a condition-precedent, that Oswald was the lone shooter. He hasn't read much on the subject, you can tell.
Ask him about 544 Camp Street, the throat wound, or JFK's missing brain, he won't want to talk about it. Because he doesn't know anything about these things.
His reasoning of course, necessarily assumes as a condition-precedent, that Oswald was the lone shooter. He hasn't read much on the subject, you can tell.
Ask him about 544 Camp Street, the throat wound, or JFK's missing brain, he won't want to talk about it. Because he doesn't know anything about these things.