05-12-2013, 07:17 AM
David Josephs Wrote:Are you suggesting it is not possible what was offered as EVIDENCE of Pitzer, wasn't Pitzer at all?
How many times in this and related cases is the evidence different when finally re-reviewed, than at the time the evidence was created?
The PICTURES say one thing, while those that actually worked on the body tells another.
If you asked Perry, McClellend or Crenshaw to tell you what the WCR medical evidence says wouldn't it conflict with what they saw that night?...
and yet 30+ years later the analysis of photos trumps the autopsy reports...
Martin - why are you shying away from MacD's 4 points? They were the crux of your proof initially... and when I show you how these 4 points are not only easily produced without suicide but contradicts the original reports, you revert back to the 30 year old photos and current analysis. ??
Finally, was stating the obvious - a suicided person would be set up to look like suicide - just that... too obvious for you to even comment?
What good would forging the Mona Lisa be if you used crayons?
When found with 5 bolt action shots to the body, Marshall's death was STILL ruled suicide...
And then we have Dan Marvin... red-herring?
I'm ready to move on to other things as well Martin... another "suicide" in this case is simply par for the course.
Believe what you will... how many times are you willing to say our USG told the truth about what happens in their midst, when that truth would be detrimental to their credibility? How many lies have been discovered in this case alone, let alone the other tens of thousands of cases where the Military and FBI are involved.
Contrary to what most may think, I do not find demons behind every action... yet do you care to list anything from our USG that was exactly as it appears?
DJ
David,
I do not understand this post. I cannot see how it relates to what I wrote at all.
What you're suggesting now is that the autopsy photos are essentially "fakes" because they don't show what you want them to show.
How convenient.
And yet I showed you that the deputy county medical examiner observed muzzle marks and powder burns around the wound and, in fact, the autopsy report notes "black granular material" around the margins of the wound. I also explained that the report was deficient because the doctors who performed it were not forensic pathologists.
But you ignored every word of it.
And I don't understand that at all.