06-12-2013, 12:49 AM
Seamus Coogan Wrote:Anita the whippings and horses were not aimed at you. Indeed, I find what you have to say intriguing. Furthermore, I find Donalds post is actually very interesting. Please tell me if Earl was well aware of the law why did he put up such a struggle? A common myth indeed one I believed until a few hours ago was the "Old Texas law" line. Was Earl just being obnoxious, if so that goes against a lot of reports stating Earl was a really decent guy.
Sorry I missed this Seamus,
clearly, I too see him as decent but there is plenty of room in there for some thought for himself.
I mean he was there on the premises and must of been paying attention, what is not to like with at the very least securing the inquest for Dallas County or even better overseeing the most important autopsy that he ever could hope to get? It would hurt no one.I'm sure many here would agree that even decent folk can do right by getting in someone's face even when it's none of their business.
I personally see the "official" explainations behind the removal as without merit and those that took the first move have admitted choosing selfish reasons, disregarding local law, procedure and the chain of evidence, so at the very least it was a pot/kettle situation.
"Jackie wouldn't leave without the body" it's an explaination sure but it's not defendable.
O'Donnell the Kennedy man, a friend should have said "to hell with Johnson I'm not doing it".
It's what Rose would have wanted/done.
Thanks also for the link to that most refreshing article.
I have much reading still to do.