11-12-2013, 04:05 PM
Sean Murphy's arguments for Oswald being on the top steps of the TSBD right after the shooting are underestimated I think.
His research on this subject has the potential of becoming the final nail in the coffin of the Warren report. Why?
1) It can not be refuted. Not even by John McAdams.
2) It's visual (the Darnell-fragment, the Fritz-notes, the newspaper-clippings)
Visual proof is the best way to convince people, even if what you're saying is incorrect. Dale Meyers understands this.
Sean Murphy's research is now buried in a very long thread over at the Education Forum (Jim DiEugenio pointed to this in his review of Philip Shenon's book, that's how I found it). Should Murphy make an essay out of this? If he did, we would all read it I'm sure, but we would be the only ones. The media would ignore it, as they always do. I think the best way to present this explosive evidence is in a short film, with a good narrator. And get it out on Youtube, Vimeo and - hopefully - television.
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....354&page=1
His research on this subject has the potential of becoming the final nail in the coffin of the Warren report. Why?
1) It can not be refuted. Not even by John McAdams.
2) It's visual (the Darnell-fragment, the Fritz-notes, the newspaper-clippings)
Visual proof is the best way to convince people, even if what you're saying is incorrect. Dale Meyers understands this.
Sean Murphy's research is now buried in a very long thread over at the Education Forum (Jim DiEugenio pointed to this in his review of Philip Shenon's book, that's how I found it). Should Murphy make an essay out of this? If he did, we would all read it I'm sure, but we would be the only ones. The media would ignore it, as they always do. I think the best way to present this explosive evidence is in a short film, with a good narrator. And get it out on Youtube, Vimeo and - hopefully - television.
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....354&page=1