24-12-2013, 06:24 PM
Douglas Valentine Wrote:Peter Lemkin Wrote:Magda Hassan Wrote:I ended up watching this at long last a few nights ago. Doug Valentine is pretty spot on actually.
Quote:All of which brings me to my review.Yep. Very postmodern and with all that limitation and decontextualisation and irrelevance.
Dirty Wars
Dirty Wars is a post-modern film by Jeremy Scahill, about himself, starring himself in many poses.
The film owes more to Sergio Leone and Kathryn Bigelow than Constantinos Gavras. Scahill certainly is no Leslie Cockburn: there is no Tony Poe telling how the CIA facilitates heroin shipments; no Richard Secord suing him for unraveling the financial intrigues of the CIA's secret operators. The CIA is rarely mentioned.
There is no reference to the Guerra Sucia in Argentina.
Scahill is no Franz Fanon documenting the devastating psychological effects of racism on society. There are no cameos by Jean Paul Sartre advocating violent retribution on Hollywood, no mingling with the Taliban in their caves as they conspire against their Yankee oppressors at the Sundance Film Festival.
We get the first taste of his self-indulgent idiocy when he says it is "hard to tell" when the Dirty War began. He does tell us, however, that he is on the "front lines" of the war on terror.
Scahill (hereafter JS) brags that he wasn't going to find the front lines in Kabul, although he could have, if he knew where to look. Instead he just looks around furtively on his way to the scene of a war crime. We see a close-up of his face.
Quote:The film ends and I wonder what he could have produced if he hadn't melodramatized and spent so much time and film on close-ups. I wonder what he could have done if he'd read a few history books.Indeed. It would have been a far better movie with an historical context in which to place the current Dirty War/s. People who don't know that history wont notice though. Nevertheless a powerful work of art and some good storytelling told. Definitely a must watch.
Ultimately, the film is so devoid of historical context, and so contrived, as to render it a work of art, rather than political commentary.
I'm not saying that DV didn't have some valid points - he did....but I don't think JS is on the 'other side'....and we [the progressive community] have a history or goring our own - while the neo-fascists all march pretty much in lockstep -despite their differences; the reasons, I think, are obvious, but something the left and especially the far-left need to keep in mind and under control. IMHO
Here's my first article calling out Scahill for his "misinformation" or 'disinformation", if you think there is a difference, let me know. http://original.antiwar.com/douglas-vale...ity-state/ To pooh-pooh my satirical mocking of Scahill, which he deserves, is a way of avoiding his complicity in the lies that enable the Cult of Death. Examine his mis-dis/information.
I hadnt seen this one before. The "left" press never seems to want to go there anymore. The support for the narrative provided by journalists like Scahill helps to maintain the illusion that the CIA doesn't matter that much anymore while at the same time shifting the blame to Bush era policies.