15-01-2014, 03:15 PM
Ray Mitcham Wrote:Nick Rose Wrote:so, i think this was already asked earlier with no definite reply,
but is there not anyone here who may know from whence the empty backyard photo derived,
or where it first appeared?
It is some of the strongest real evidence we have of a conspiracy, and as such it would be nice to source it.
It is, IMHO, unkfakeable (probably still in 2014, atleast without some obvious digital artifacting somewhere), so the source is mildly irrelevant, but I would still like to be aware of where it came from.
A book possibly? But still, any CT publisher must have first received it themselves in a pretty damn serious leak from somewhere.
Truly surprised the photo ever saw the light of day.
Nick I said on the opening page, one way of finding out the truth would be to contact Oliver Stone and ask him if he had the photograph manufactured for his film. Seems an obvious thing to do if there is no other way of proving where it came from. If Stone says he didn't then it is obviously a fraud.
Anybody know Olly's email as I can't reach him on twitter.?
Thanks guys.
RAY - I'm not sure it is even worth contacting old Mr. Stone.
With what insane computer technology do you fathom he possibly had Oswald removed and then had nonexistent background imagery seamlessly added back in to the photo? I'm talking not a leaf on a tree or a shadow out of place when he had it done?
I think it is much more probable that all of these photos -- the ones Mr. Josephs so kindly posted a link to above -- were either created just before Oswald's arrest ... or quite possibly even *at the time of his arrest* and then some poor sap stayed up overnight forging them.
I don't think it is pushing the bounds to suggest they were created at the time of his arrest.
1. It would have been perfect cover for taking the empty photos to start with.
2. They couldn't possibly have had the BYP "finished" before his arrest in the first place, since the face image of Oswald that they used WAS his ARREST photo!