27-02-2014, 07:02 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:It's also possible the reason Baker didn't mention Oswald in his first affidavit is because he encountered Oswald again on the 4th floor landing. Having seen two Oswalds in two different places Baker may have been clued to leave this unmentioned until further notified. That would explain the lack of curiosity about this 4th floor person at the time. It doesn't make sense that Baker would draw a gun on the lunchroom Oswald but then not confront the 4th floor person who was much closer to the crime scene Baker was running towards. The lack of description of the 4th floor person and original lack of mention of the lunchroom encounter could be explained by Baker encountering one Oswald after another.
This makes sense because having been told by Truly that Oswald was one of ours Baker might not be inclined to confront him if he saw him again on the 4th floor.
How did Oswald beat Baker to the 4th floor? Or wait, let me guess, he figured Oswald had a twin brother working there, and if Oswald was okay, that automatically made the twin okay.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964