25-03-2014, 06:52 PM
David Josephs Wrote:I'm sorry you feel that way Albert... From my vantage point GP chery-picks a topic, finds a few quotes that may support his opinion and leaves it at that.
From what I understand the two arguments here are whether mention of Schweitzer College informing Marguerite Oswald of Lee's intention to attend in April is what made Hoover suspect two Oswald's or whether this was indirect evidence of Hoover's background knowledge of the Harvey & Lee program. Didn't the embassy retain Oswald's passport when he went into Russia? Next, I believe the second argument is whether Marguerite's lack of memory about the Fain interview was because it wasn't the same Marguerite who was interviewed therefore they slipped and allowed a Marguerite with no memory of the interview to speak at the Commission hearing.
I tend to side with you, David, for the reasons you say above. While not having read Harvey & Lee I believe Parker's arguments are evasive of the greater surrounding evidence that confirms it like the fluidness in Russian, doubles in Dallas, etc. Whether that is prolonging the debate needlessly is up to others. As far as valid content I believe Parker fairly possesses that from his input. Valid conclusions, I'm not sure.