11-05-2014, 06:53 AM
Drew Phipps Wrote:So what we need is some college level math genuis who needs a PHD thesis and is willing to "reverse engineer" the ballistic calculator and graph us a set of data (spreadsheet) in five(?) dimensions including rifle zeroing range, bullet mass, diameter, drag, and muzzle velocity that would, if applied to a bullet, would duplicate the ballistic results of the FBI test. That would allow us to identify any commercially (or military) available bullets that could accomplish the ballistic feat Frazier documented, which would be proof positive of the kind of bullets used in the FBI''s test. Your work seems pretty conclusive that the FBI didn't use the ammo and gun that they claimed to. Alternately, there could be NO bullets that were available in the 60's, which would be proof positive that the FBI just made it all up from dreams and starlight.
Anyone know any math postgrads?
I KNOW that Harold Weisberg and his lawyer Lesar deposed Frazier a part of a FOIA-type lawsuit. I wish I could navigate Harolds collection on-line to find the deposition. You would guess that an adverse examination might reveal some or all of the flaws.
That's the whole point of my work, Drew. The results Frazier claimed on the firing tests are impossible. There is NO rifle, not in this dimension anyways, capable of giving us those results.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964