14-05-2014, 01:22 PM
Despite Frazier's testimony, most of the shots averaged 4 inches to the right of the bullseye at 100 yards, except on one target where the gun was shooting an average of 2 inches to the right.
I realize that tiny differences on the shooter's end can make big differences at the target, and further that these were supposed to be "speed" tests with accuracy as a secondary factor, but don't these wildly disparate results for "right drift" when you scan across target sets mean something? At least doesn't it mean that Frazier is correcting his aim?
I realize that tiny differences on the shooter's end can make big differences at the target, and further that these were supposed to be "speed" tests with accuracy as a secondary factor, but don't these wildly disparate results for "right drift" when you scan across target sets mean something? At least doesn't it mean that Frazier is correcting his aim?