17-06-2014, 04:45 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Drew Phipps Wrote:Why would Bringuier need to be briefed?
Because he had seen Oswald acting like a strong anti-Castro supporter volunteering his services. The whole Oswald/Bringuier thing was probably arranged, but after the assassination it was important to sell Oswald as the Lone Nut commie.
The anti-castro pretense predates the pro-castro leafleting, the fight, the court appearance, etc. Bringuier, whether he's knowingly working with the CIA or not (with respect to Cuba), wouldn't need a "briefing" or talking points to talk on the post-assassination TV show, as he has been personally involved with each of those steps and can just repeat true things that he personally witnessed. Set-up, or no set-up, Bringuier needs only to be a witness at that point. No point in risking a contact between handler and asset for him to repeat well documented and published events.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."