Reopen kennedy case forum

[Lauren Johnson]

I'm not trying to inject myself into an argument here, but what's "CT-er" mean? What's "Factualist" mean?



Ok, here I am trying to inject myself into the argument: Bob P.'s research on ballistics and forensics is some of the clearest and most sensible work on JFK that I've come across in decades of reading. Furthermore, his ballistics and forensics work is consistent with, and expands on, work done by the pioneers from the 60's and 70's. I may not agree with all his conclusions and theories, but I'm sure that his work is rational and considered.

Albert, my opinion, I don't agree with many of your conclusions. But you're intelligent. And you don't need to use profanity or be insulting to make your point, so that makes you more of a convincing and interesting person to discuss controversial stuff with, than those that have to resort to same.

You two guys could do me a favor by not bringing the BS from this other forum into this polite and rational group. It's just not worth it.

The usual binary is a Conspiracy Theorist (CT) vs. the Lone Nutter (LN). A Factualist is a different version of CT -- more positive, I would guess.

Actually, most of this thread has to with what is going on in another Forum and is therefore technically out of bounds. It has been kinda fun, tho. ::hobbyhorse::