05-07-2014, 08:33 PM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:If one looks at Baker's first day affidavit, there is no mention of it at all. Period. And what makes that even harder to understand is this: When Baker filled out the affidavit with no mention at all of this incident, Oswald was sitting right across from him in the room.
I thought Baker's first DPD report/affidavit was that his encounter with a unnamed TSBD employee (who was vouched for by Truly) was on the third or fourth floor...which would have been much better for the official story. Oswald was sitting right there in the station at that point as well, and he is not named in that statement. Why wouldn't a post-assassination frame up use that version of events, as opposed to having to settle for the far more problematic lunchroom story?
I must say that the Geneva Hines WC testimony is the best evidence I've seen so far supporting the idea that Oswald was on the first floor the entire time of the assassination. Since she was facing the door out and didn't see him leave the second floor. She was busy on the phone, though.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."