Malaysian plane crashes on Ukraine-Russia border - live

[Peter Presland]

The implications of NATO members sending armed personnel to "Help protect the investigators" are grave indeed. At it's most trivial, absurd and rhetorical, it begs the question "Protect them from who, what and with what?"

With just a modicum of thought it is clear that the scenario painted in this article is frighteningly credible.

Meanwhile the Western MSM warmongering crescendo of blame and condemnation of Putin/Russia is, if anything getting even louder. As in this from Forbes (often a publisher of reasonably establishment-sceptical stuff) this morning: Times Report Casts Shame on Obama's Handling of Ukraine Crisis . Hint he is being far too tolerant of evil Russia and should have sent in the US military ages ago.
[URL="http://antifasistit.blogspot.com/2014/07/ukraine-warning-of-imminent-wwiii.html"]
[/URL]

Ukraine: WARNING of imminent WWIII!

Open-source intelligence points to an imminent danger of RussiaNATO war in the Ukraine.

I now think MH17 crashed exactly where it was planned, right in the center of Donbass. Cities form a protective ring around Donbass, but the crash site in the middle of agricultural fields is the perfect spot for an Ukie / NATO airborne invasion.

The retired Russian air force colonel Aleksand Zhilin claimed the NATO plan was to crash the plane in the Southern Calderon so that the Ukie troops now trapped there could be relieved by airborne NATO forces. He said that this plan failed as the plane somehow diverted north and landed in area held the Novorossiyan Armed Forces.

Zhilin says that based on the Russian ATC radar data confirmed by the transponder data stored in the FlightRadar24 database the plane flew some 10 km past the crash site, somehow magically turned around and crashed coming from the east. The pattern of debris however proves the exact opposite: the plane came from the west.
http://ai-zhilin.livejournal.com/1419422.html

The fact is, that the GPS data received by MH17 and forwarded to Russian ATC by its transponder beeps and to the FlightRadar24 database through its automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) beeps is 20 km from where the plane was at the time.

This can only be explained in two ways:

1. The false GPS data came form an escort fighter spoofing HM17
   
2. MH17 was fed false GPS by the GPS jammer on the escort fighter.
   

https://twitter.com/PetriKrohn/status/49...7405878272

Both of these techniques were on the menu in the NATO SeaBreeze exercise. RIA Novosti now reports that GPS manipulation had been observed in the area.
http://en.ria.ru/world/20140725/19127039...Crash.html

***

This is exactly the kind of end result that NATO would like to achieve with their false-flag MH17 attack. The security threat posed by these troops / "unarmed" police can only be offset by a tenfold number of *armed* Russian troops. (Or a Russian no-fly, no-drive zone over all of Donbass.)

One must assume that the real mission of these troops is to prepare the landing zone for a NATO or Ukrainian airborne offensive, or alternatively, an Ukrainian armed breakthrough. It does not matter if the troops are unarmed. Their role is to act as the eyes and ears of the invading force. They will hide in the bushes looking for "evidence" and report on the movement of Novorossiyan forces with their satellite communication gear.

Australia has "promised" to send 200 armed troops. These are already in the UK I hear. With whom did they agree about this mission? Kiev? I do not think anyone asked Novorossiya or even Russia. How the hell do they think they will get in? On the heels of the of a Ukie tank battalion?
(It is more likely the Australians would need to spearhead the tank battalion, and act as the infantry protection Ukie tanks are desperately lacking.)

To quote the Malaysian pro-NATO press:

"You need radar, reconnaissance, commandos, anti-tank weapons, attack helicopters... Well, that's starting to look like a small-scale war," Klep told Dutch broadcaster NOS.
http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malays...perts-warn

***

We are now waiting for direct US and NATO aggression on the Ukraine and Novorossiya. Russia needs to make the choice now; whether to defend Novorossiya or allow total NATO occupation of the Ukraine.

It is clear that all NATO actions are aimed at provoking Russia to act militarily. This would allow the US to isolate Russia from its "International Community". It is widely believed that this is a trap and Russia should not fall for it.

Yet other are saying that Putin has a cunning plan, and after two years of US occupation Russia would somehow magically turn the tide. Maybe.

On the other hand, NATO very much wants all of Ukraine. They very much hope that Russia will not intervene and kill their troops. (Russkies killing Russkies is always a good thing.) They want to occupy Ukraine without any effort.

Russia is now between Scylla and Charybdis. Both alternatives are horrible. To decide, Russia must resolve which is the outcome NATO wants and chose the other.

Russia must understand that NATO is now the reincarnation of the Third Reich.

Source: http://antifasistit.blogspot.co.uk/2014/...wwiii.html