09-12-2014, 11:42 PM
Exactly. Why did a local hospital announce, ahead of time, that they were reserving three floors for riot casualties? Why does the media always, in these carefully selected cases, prime the pubic for expected riots?
And why do the rioters always remain safely ensconced in their own lower-income neighborhoods? Why burn their own homes and businesses? Wouldn't it make a more effective political statement to walk into an upper-class neighborhood and terrorize them? Loot their Starbucks? They didn't even bull-rush a police station. If their beef was with police, why not take their hostility out on them? I'm not saying they should be violent against anyone, but their actions simply make no sense.
And what about the New York Times reporter who published the address of the police officer? What kind of "journalist"
does something like that? How is such a biased call to violence consistent with her role as "reporter?"
And why do the rioters always remain safely ensconced in their own lower-income neighborhoods? Why burn their own homes and businesses? Wouldn't it make a more effective political statement to walk into an upper-class neighborhood and terrorize them? Loot their Starbucks? They didn't even bull-rush a police station. If their beef was with police, why not take their hostility out on them? I'm not saying they should be violent against anyone, but their actions simply make no sense.
And what about the New York Times reporter who published the address of the police officer? What kind of "journalist"
does something like that? How is such a biased call to violence consistent with her role as "reporter?"