08-01-2015, 05:58 PM
Dawn Meredith Wrote:Peter Lemkin Wrote:I still suspect the two ID's left in the car were plants to mislead, those brothers could have long been out of France and the real persons involved are now exiting or have already left France. The third person, who turned themselves in, says he's innocent and may well be. This was very professional and may have included a complete exit strategy, complete with false trails that will lead nowhere.
Two ids left in the car?? Ok now I am officially suspicious. Kurt Haskell, the attorney who witnessed the fake underwear bomber fiasco posted a lot on fb this am why this is a false flag. I had to leave for court, but will go back and copy and paste for folks here.
This is his post:
I have to comment on the Paris attack this morning. After being involved in a false flag attack and seeing how it all played out, I feel I am now a pretty good judge of the false flag methods. This one actually has elements of tricks used on 9-11, Boston Bombing, Benghazi and the Underwear Bomber. OK, first of all, when there is a false flag, all video given to the public is propaganda and the real video that would show what really happened is hidden. In this case, we have video of an attacker shooting a blank at a cop. He supposedly dies from this shot. However, there is no blood. The gun doesn't recoil. The pavement isn't damaged. The dust from the blank can be seen hitting the pavement two feet away. Just like the Boston Bombing when fake pictures of the so called perpetrators were shown everywhere to create a false story. Just like 9-11 when an airport picture of Mohammed Atta at a different airport was shown. In all other cases, the real video is forever hidden from public view. Next, we have one of the so called perpetrators drop his identification at the scene. Just like on 9-11 when a perpetrators passport was found undamaged in the wtc rubble. It is used as propaganda to show certainty and a picture of the now "proven" perpetrator. Remember, the media's job is to push the false propaganda and hide the truth. It is necessary to quickly name the perpetrators to etch their images in the public's mind as the public will ignore this story after 48 hours or so. Then we have the terrorists yelling Allah Akbar as the "shooting" takes place. This reminds me of the underwear Bomber case when Umar yelled that one day while entering the courtroom. It also reminds me of the released 9-11 hijacker audio. The fact is that if this shooting was real, the perpetrators would have many other things to concentrate on that yelling Allah Akbar during the attack. Of course, this is pushed by the media to create more evidence that such attack was done by Muslims. Also, we have the perpetrators telling someone at the scene that they are Al Qaeda from Yemen. Why would they do this? They wouldn't. This is setting the stage for some sort of action against Yemen just like the underwear bomber case resulted in the bombing of Yemen. Not to mention, we have this attack being blamed on insulting magazine publications when Benghazi was blamed on an insulting video. Nonsense. More lies. Lastly, we have the rooftop camera set up to capture the event just like on 9-11 to film the 1st plane hitting the wtc. This one is screaming false flag very early on. The bad guys need to learn some less obvious tricks.