09-01-2015, 11:03 PM
What a sad example this is of how the Lords of Print were an integral part of this crime!
Mexican authorities bent over backwards to cooperate with U.S. authorities (just ask Sylvia Duran about that)! U.S. dailies thoughtlessly printed so-called "evidence" that couldn't stand the light of even a cursory examination. (How 'bout a certain money order for an Italian rifle that was never deposited or paid or processed in any way?)
The FBI, after the secret transfer of Oswald's possessions from Dallas to Washington on 11/23/63, created scores of false documents which were secretly returned to Dallas police on 11/26/63. Major U.S. news outlets have never reported, to take just one example of these OBVIOUSLY forged documents, that Oswald's infamous 1956 Income Tax return did not include his income from the USMC? (Why? Because the Dept. of the Navy didn't disclose his 1956 USMC income until 9/15/64, long after the document was forged.)
If Oswald really went to Mexico City, why wasn't the CIA able to produce his mug shot in front of the Cuban and Russian offices from all those pulse cameras and backup cameras? Why did even J. Edgar Hoover tell LBJ that the voice of "Oswald" in Mexico City was from an "imposter." And how did "Oswald" break all those land speed records on his way up to Texas?
DJ has made an excellent case that these documents are bs, but the Lords of Print don't even bother to consider it. How sad it all is.
Jim
HarveyandLee.net
Mexican authorities bent over backwards to cooperate with U.S. authorities (just ask Sylvia Duran about that)! U.S. dailies thoughtlessly printed so-called "evidence" that couldn't stand the light of even a cursory examination. (How 'bout a certain money order for an Italian rifle that was never deposited or paid or processed in any way?)
The FBI, after the secret transfer of Oswald's possessions from Dallas to Washington on 11/23/63, created scores of false documents which were secretly returned to Dallas police on 11/26/63. Major U.S. news outlets have never reported, to take just one example of these OBVIOUSLY forged documents, that Oswald's infamous 1956 Income Tax return did not include his income from the USMC? (Why? Because the Dept. of the Navy didn't disclose his 1956 USMC income until 9/15/64, long after the document was forged.)
If Oswald really went to Mexico City, why wasn't the CIA able to produce his mug shot in front of the Cuban and Russian offices from all those pulse cameras and backup cameras? Why did even J. Edgar Hoover tell LBJ that the voice of "Oswald" in Mexico City was from an "imposter." And how did "Oswald" break all those land speed records on his way up to Texas?
DJ has made an excellent case that these documents are bs, but the Lords of Print don't even bother to consider it. How sad it all is.
Jim
HarveyandLee.net